Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134686›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

Site-selective cleavage of peptides and proteins targeting aromatic amino acid residues.

Ayan Bandyopadhyay, Rajib Sarkar

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ayan BandyopadhyayDepartment of Chemistry, Chapra Government College Nadia-741123 West Bengal India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2048-0113
Rajib SarkarDepartment of Higher Education, Government of West Bengal India rajibsarkar.org@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6562-2201

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The site-selective cleavage of peptides and proteins at specific amino acid residues is an important strategy for the modification of biomolecules as it can potentially transmute the reactivity profile of the whole molecule. Moreover, precise cleavage of a specific amide bond in peptides and proteins has enormous applications in the domains of chemical biology, genetics, and protein engineering. Among the 20 proteinogenic amino acids, tryptophan (Trp, W), tyrosine (Tyr, Y), phenylalanine (Phe, F) and histidine (His, H) are classified as aromatic amino acids that maintain the function of protein folding through hydrophobic and π-π interactions. Thus, scissoring at a specific site of an aromatic amino acid may alter the structure and function of a peptide or protein. In the last 60-70 years, great success has been achieved in the development of methods for the aromatic amino acid (AAA)-selective cleavage of peptides and proteins. Generally, aromatic side chains are derivatized in the presence of specific reagents. Consequently, either the downstream or the upstream amide bond of the aromatic side chain is activated, and hydrolysis of the amide bond splits the peptide. Unfortunately, a systematic review covering this methodological development of the AAA-selective fission of peptide is lacking to date. Thus, in this review, we aim to showcase the up-to-date progress in the site-selective rupture of peptide bonds at aromatic amino acid residues with an emphasis on the postulated mechanisms, enabling future researchers to further drive progress in this research field.

Identifiers

PMID40134686
PMCPMC11934106

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.