ArticleWorld journal of nephrology2025
Role of variation coefficient of stone density in determining success of shock wave lithotripsy in urinary calculi.
Article in World journal of nephrology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Variation coefficient of stone density - can it crack the stone?World journal of nephrology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVarious stone factors can affect the net results of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Recently a new factor called variation coefficient of stone density (VCSD) is being considered to have an impact on stone free rates.
aimTo assess the role of VCSD in determining success of SWL in urinary calculi.
methodsCharts review was utilized for collection of data variables. The patients were subjected to SWL, using an electromagnetic lithotripter. Mean stone density (MSD), stone heterogeneity index (SHI), and VCSD were calculated by generating regions of interest on computed tomography (CT) images. Role of these factors were determined by applying the relevant statistical tests for continuous and categorical variables and a
resultsThere were a total of 407 patients included in the analysis. The mean age of the subjects in this study was 38.89 ± 14.61 years. In total, 165 out of the 407 patients could not achieve stone free status. The successful group had a significantly lower stone volume as compared to the unsuccessful group (
conclusionVCSD, a useful CT based parameter, can be utilized to gauge stone fragility and hence the prediction of SWL outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.