ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Effectiveness of Ampicillin-Sulbactam Versus Ceftriaxone for the Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Older Adults: A Target Trial Emulation Study.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association Between Preoperative Frailty and Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury, Complications, and Resource Utilization in Older Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Surgery.Geriatrics & gerontology international · 2026Article
- The Role of the Respiratory Microbiome in Pneumonia.Clinics in chest medicine · 2026Review
- The impact of frailty on postoperative complications and resource utilization in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).Nagoya journal of medical science · 2026Article
- Molecular basis of ampicillin resistance: combinatorial mechanisms and future strategies.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2026Review
- Comparative Safety of Empirical Antibiotic Classes in Newly Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Underdosed and Underappreciated: Why Japanese Community-Acquired Pneumonia Outcomes With Ampicillin-Sulbactam May Not Translate Globally.Open forum infectious diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Current guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) include ampicillin-sulbactam as an initial treatment option, though they do not mandate routine coverage of anaerobic organisms. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ampicillin-sulbactam with that of ceftriaxone as initial treatment for CAP in older adults. Methods: This study was conducted using the target trial emulation framework, using a nationwide Japanese database (May 2010-June 2023). The study included patients aged ≥65 years, admitted to Diagnosis Procedure Combination hospitals for CAP, who received either ampicillin-sulbactam or ceftriaxone as the initial treatment. The exposure group received ampicillin-sulbactam, while the control group received ceftriaxone, both on the day of hospitalization. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was the development of Results: The study included 26 633 older patients hospitalized with CAP, with 14 906 receiving ampicillin-sulbactam and 11 727 receiving ceftriaxone as initial treatment. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the ampicillin-sulbactam group was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate than the ceftriaxone group (10.5% vs 9.0%, respectively; adjusted risk difference, 1.5% [95% confidence interval, .7%-2.4%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [1.08-1.31]). The incidence of Conclusions: In older patients with CAP, initial treatment with ampicillin-sulbactam was associated with higher mortality compared to treatment with ceftriaxone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.