Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134633›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025

Effectiveness of Ampicillin-Sulbactam Versus Ceftriaxone for the Initial Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Older Adults: A Target Trial Emulation Study.

Shungo Yamamoto, Akihiro Shiroshita, Yuki Kataoka, Hidehiro Someko

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Shungo YamamotoDepartment of Transformative Infection Control Development Studies, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3207-8403
Akihiro ShiroshitaDivision of Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Yuki KataokaScientific Research Works Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7982-5213
Hidehiro SomekoScientific Research Works Peer Support Group (SRWS-PSG), Osaka, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7195-2055

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current guidelines for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) include ampicillin-sulbactam as an initial treatment option, though they do not mandate routine coverage of anaerobic organisms. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of ampicillin-sulbactam with that of ceftriaxone as initial treatment for CAP in older adults. Methods: This study was conducted using the target trial emulation framework, using a nationwide Japanese database (May 2010-June 2023). The study included patients aged ≥65 years, admitted to Diagnosis Procedure Combination hospitals for CAP, who received either ampicillin-sulbactam or ceftriaxone as the initial treatment. The exposure group received ampicillin-sulbactam, while the control group received ceftriaxone, both on the day of hospitalization. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was the development of Results: The study included 26 633 older patients hospitalized with CAP, with 14 906 receiving ampicillin-sulbactam and 11 727 receiving ceftriaxone as initial treatment. After inverse probability of treatment weighting, the ampicillin-sulbactam group was associated with a higher in-hospital mortality rate than the ceftriaxone group (10.5% vs 9.0%, respectively; adjusted risk difference, 1.5% [95% confidence interval, .7%-2.4%]; adjusted odds ratio, 1.19 [1.08-1.31]). The incidence of Conclusions: In older patients with CAP, initial treatment with ampicillin-sulbactam was associated with higher mortality compared to treatment with ceftriaxone.

Indexed as

ampicillin/sulbactamanaerobic bacteriaaspiration pneumoniaceftriaxonecommunity-acquired pneumonia

Identifiers

PMID40134633
PMCPMC11934920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.