Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134599›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

LAR, FAR, and PLR as prognostic factors in high-grade urothelial carcinoma of the bladder after surgery.

Huadong Xie, Yuanbi Huang, Chengjie Ban, Wei Wei, Han Tang, Qingming Huang, Zhengwei Su, Zhi Cheng, Tianling Liao, Kangji Liao and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Huadong Xie *Department of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yuanbi Huang *Department of Urology, Liuzhou Worker's Hospital, Liuzhou, Guangxi, China.
Chengjie Ban *Department of Urology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Radiology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Han TangDepartment of Urology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Qingming HuangDepartment of Urology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhengwei SuDepartment of Urology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Zhi ChengDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Tianling LiaoDepartment of Graduate School, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Kangji LiaoDepartment of Urology, Wuming Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Liquan ZhouDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Xianlin YiDepartment of Urology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We evaluated the prognostic significance of the Lactate Dehydrogenase-to-Serum Albumin Ratio (LAR), Fibrinogen-to-Albumin Ratio (FAR), and Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in patients with high-grade urothelial carcinoma (HGUC) of the bladder who underwent radical cystectomy (RC). These markers have been reported to be associated with the prognosis of various cancers. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on HGUC patients who underwent RC at Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital between January 2013 and June 2021. Optimal cutoff values for LAR, FAR, and PLR were established. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate survival outcomes, while univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses identified independent prognostic factors. A nomogram was developed to predict survival, with validation through time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration plots, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: A total of 180 patients were included, with a follow-up period ranging from 2 to 127 months (49.28 ± 37.87 months). The optimal cutoff values for LAR, PLR, and FAR were 4.46, 139.68, and 0.13, respectively. Multivariable Cox regression identified tumor stage, LAR, PLR, and FAR as independent prognostic factors. Specifically, Stage III (HR = 25.44, 95% CI: 5.20-124.35, p < 0.001) and Stage IV (HR = 11.28, 95% CI: 3.18-40.05, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors for poor survival. A low PLR (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.27-0.76, p = 0.003), low FAR (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.29-0.89, p = 0.018), and low LAR (HR = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.23-0.67, p < 0.001) were independently associated with improved survival. The nomogram demonstrated high accuracy in predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival (OS), with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.866, 0.84, and 0.831, respectively. Further validation confirmed the model's stability and clinical applicability. Conclusion: LAR, PLR, and FAR are promising prognostic factors for HGUC of the bladder following RC, showing substantial potential for prognostic evaluation.

Indexed as

fibrinogen-to-albumin ratiohigh-grade urothelial carcinomalactate dehydrogenase-to-serum albumin ratioplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratioprognosis

Identifiers

PMID40134599
PMCPMC11932906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.