ArticleCytoJournal2025
Computer-assisted scatter plot analysis of cell and nuclear areas distinguishes urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.
Article in CytoJournal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Image analysis in urine cytology typically focuses on individual cells, particularly nuclear features. This study aimed to analyze non-tumor and urothelial carcinoma cases by examining scatter plots of cell or cell cluster areas and the maximum nuclear area within them. Material and Methods: The study included 192 cases: 52 negative and 140 positive. Whole slide images were generated using a virtual slide scanner, and image analysis was conducted with cytological analysis software. Scatter plots were created for cells/cell cluster areas and the largest connected nuclear areas (scatter plot for cells/cell cluster), as well as for nuclear area and perimeter (scatter plot for nucleus). Results: In the scatter plot for the nucleus, significant differences were noted between cytology-negative and cytology-positive groups ( Conclusion: In urine cytology, cellular overlap and cluster density were key factors for distinguishing malignant from benign cells. This image analysis algorithm was useful in identifying malignant clusters with large, connected nuclear regions. The algorithm could potentially detect both invasive and early-stage tumors, highlighting the need for further development of such tools for routine diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.