Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134563›Full record

ReviewAJOG global reports2025

How obstetricians experience stillbirth and perinatal loss: a systematic review and meta-synthesis.

Frances Cates, Sara Wetzler, Tabitha Wishlade, Mehali Patel, Catherine E Aiken

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in AJOG global reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Frances CatesDepartment of Liberal Arts (Cates), University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Sara WetzlerDepartment of History and Philosophy of Science (Wetzler), University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Tabitha WishladeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Wishlade and Aiken), University of Cambridge, The Rosie Hospital and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Mehali PatelSands, the Stillbirth and Neonatal Death Charity (Patel), London, United Kingdom.
Catherine E AikenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (Wishlade and Aiken), University of Cambridge, The Rosie Hospital and NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Globally, ∼2 million babies are stillborn annually, many in low- and middle-income countries. We aim to understand the experience of obstetricians caring for parents who experience stillbirth and perinatal loss across global settings. Data Sources: Study Eligibility Criteria: Studies with qualitative components describing experiences of obstetricians providing stillbirth care in any global setting. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme checklist for qualitative research was utilized to conduct quality assessment. NVivo software was employed for inductive coding and thematic analysis. Results: Thirteen qualitative studies from both low- and high-resource settings met the inclusion criteria for meta-synthesis. We identified several major themes including the emotional burdens experienced by obstetricians providing stillbirth care, the challenges of patient-provider interactions following adverse outcomes, and a lack of support and resources. Obstetricians across global settings felt devastation, guilt, blame, and a sense of personal responsibility following stillbirth. Obstetricians struggled to navigate the burden of expectation placed on their overall provision of care and tended to question their own professional competence. A subset of obstetricians felt unprepared for the complexity of patient-provider interactions following stillbirth. Conclusions: Obstetricians experienced complex and conflicting emotions, citing high emotional burden from managing stillbirth cases. Obstetricians identified lack of training and support for providing bereavement care across healthcare settings, indicating a gap that should be filled by stillbirth and bereavement care interventions and education in obstetrical training programs across global settings. Infrastructure for bereavement care training and support systems for obstetricians are crucial to improve the quality of stillbirth and perinatal loss care and prevent an exodus of needed providers for women's care worldwide.

Indexed as

high-risk pregnancymaternal-fetal medicineobstetrician experienceperinatal lossqualitative studystillbirthsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40134563
PMCPMC11931382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.