ArticleJournal of bone oncology2024
Bone density measurement in patients with spinal metastatic tumors using chest quantitative CT deep learning model.
Article in Journal of bone oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A predictive model for low bone mass in pediatric and adolescent patients with transfusion-dependent beta-thalassemia.Translational pediatrics · 2025Article
- Applications and Performance of Artificial Intelligence in Spinal Metastasis Imaging: A Systematic Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to develop a deep learning model using the 3DResUNet architecture to predict vertebral volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) from Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) scans in patients with spinal metastatic tumors, enhancing osteoporosis screening capabilities. Methods: 749 patients with spinal metastatic tumors underwent QCT vertebral vBMD measurements. The dataset was randomly split into training (599 cases) and test sets (150 cases). The 3DResUNet model was trained for vBMD classification and prediction using QCT images processed with automated bone segmentation and ROI extraction. Results: The deep learning model demonstrated strong performance with Spearman correlation coefficients of 0.923 (training set) and 0.918 (test set) between predicted and QCT-measured vBMD values. Bland-Altman analysis showed a slight bias of -1.42 mg/cm Conclusion: The developed deep learning model using 3DResUNet effectively predicts vertebral vBMD from QCT scans in patients with spinal metastatic tumors. It provides accurate and automated vBMD measurements, potentially facilitating widespread osteoporosis screening in clinical practice, mainly where DXA availability is limited.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.