Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134490›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Race and Sex Disparities in Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery over 20 Years: A Cohort Study.

Benjamin Grobman, Liyun He, Zhou Lan, Abdelrahman Nimeri, Caroline Apovian, Alexander Turchin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Benjamin GrobmanFrom the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Liyun HeDivision of Endocrinology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.
Zhou LanFrom the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Abdelrahman NimeriFrom the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Caroline ApovianFrom the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Alexander TurchinFrom the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To determine how rates of discussion of metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) between patients with class 2 obesity and higher and their healthcare providers as well as subsequent progression to MBS have varied by race and sex over the last 20 years. Background: Obesity is a growing public health crisis. MBS remains the most effective treatment for long-term management of obesity. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of electronic health records from a large tertiary academic health system using a previously validated natural language processing algorithm. The primary outcomes were discussion of MBS between eligible patients and providers and progression to surgery. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between sociodemographic factors, time, and discussion and receipt of MBS. Results: Among 122,487 patients included in the analysis, 11,094 (9.1%) patients discussed MBS with their providers. Of these, 1348 (12.2%) progressed to MBS. Between 2000 and 2020 the annual fraction of patients who had a discussion of MBS with their providers rose from 3.2% to 10.0% ( Conclusions: Interventions to reduce racial disparities in utilization of MBS should focus on progression from discussion to MBS. Interventions to increase the uptake of MBS among men are required across the care cascade.

Indexed as

bariatric surgerydisparitiesnatural language processing

Identifiers

PMID40134490
PMCPMC11932610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.