Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134482›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Prediction Model for Textbook Outcome in Liver Surgery: Results From a Multicenter, International Cohort.

Jane Wang, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Taizo Hibi, Nuria Lluis, Camilla Gomes, Fernanda Romero-Hernandez, Han Yin, Lucia Calthorpe, Yukiyasu Okamura, Yuta Abe and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Jane WangFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Amir Ashraf GanjoueiFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Taizo HibiDepartment of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan.
Nuria LluisHepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL.
Camilla GomesFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Fernanda Romero-HernandezFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Han YinFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Lucia CalthorpeFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Yukiyasu OkamuraDivision of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan.
Yuta AbeDepartment of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Shogo TanakaDepartment of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Minoru TanabeDepartment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan.
Zeniche MoriseDepartment of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan.
Horacio AsbunHepato-Biliary and Pancreas Surgery, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, FL.
David GellerDepartment of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Mohammed Abu HilalDepartment of General Surgery, Poliambulanza Foundation Hospital, Brescia, Italy.
Mohamed AdamFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Adnan AlseidiFrom the Department of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to (1) develop a machine learning (ML) model that predicts the textbook outcome in liver surgery (TOLS) using preoperative variables and (2) validate the TOLS criteria by determining whether TOLS is associated with long-term survival after hepatectomy. Background: Textbook outcome is a composite measure that combines several favorable outcomes into a single metric and represents the optimal postoperative course. Recently, an expert panel of surgeons proposed a Delphi consensus-based definition of TOLS. Methods: Adult patients who underwent hepatectomies were identified from a multicenter, international cohort (2010-2022). After data preprocessing and train-test splitting (80:20), 4 models for predicting TOLS were trained and tested. Following model optimization, the performance of the models was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curves, and a web-based calculator was developed. In addition, a multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis was conducted to determine the association between TOLS and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 2059 patients were included, with 62.8% meeting the criteria for TOLS. The XGBoost model, which had the best performance with an area under the curve of 0.73, was chosen for the web-based calculator. The most predictive variables for having TOLS were a minimally invasive approach, fewer lesions, lower Charlson Comorbidity Index, lower preoperative creatinine levels, and smaller lesions. In the multivariable analysis, having TOLS was associated with improved OS (hazard ratio = 0.82, Conclusions: Our ML model can predict TOLS with acceptable discrimination. We validated the TOLS criteria by demonstrating a significant association with improved OS, thus supporting their use in informing patient care.

Indexed as

hepatectomyliver surgerymachine learningprediction modeltextbook outcome

Identifiers

PMID40134482
PMCPMC11932622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.