Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134481›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Defining Opportunities to Improve Perioperative Ostomy Care and Education.

Hannah Ficarino Sheffer, Burkely Smith, Jernell Simmons, Ivan Herbey, Daniel Chu, Wendy Landier, Smita Bhatia, Robert Hollis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Challenges in postoperative self-management for patients with bladder cancer and urinary stoma: a qualitative study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hannah Ficarino ShefferFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Burkely SmithFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Jernell SimmonsHeersink School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Ivan HerbeyFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Daniel ChuFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Wendy LandierInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Smita BhatiaInstitute for Cancer Outcomes and Survivorship, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.
Robert HollisFrom the Department of Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL.

Funding

Surgical Oncology Research Training ProgramT32CA229102 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HERBERT CHEN · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
Piloting an Implementation Strategy for Mainstream Genetic Testing in Colorectal CancerK08CA293312 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Robert H Hollis · 2024 to 2026
$577k
NCI NIH HHS K08 CA293312NCI NIH HHS T32 CA229102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: We sought to qualitatively identify opportunities to improve perioperative ostomy care and education. Background: Patients with a new ostomy utilize ostomy care-related resources to manage their ostomy. Many patients experience ostomy-related issues after surgery. Methods: In this qualitative study, patients who underwent the construction of a new ostomy, their caregivers, and healthcare professionals were purposively recruited for semistructured phone interviews. Interviews included questions about ostomy-related experiences, education, and resources in the perioperative phases of care. Interviews were transcribed and thematically coded using inductive content analysis with NVivo 12 Software. Focus groups of patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals were conducted to validate themes. Results: Overall, 53 interviews including 20 patients, 16 caregivers, and 17 healthcare professionals were conducted. The average age of patients and caregivers was 59 years, 69% were non-Hispanic White, 72% were female, and 39% had limited health literacy. Themes in the preoperative phase included "not knowing what to expect regarding an ostomy," "patient difficulty understanding their health condition," and "overwhelming amount of information regarding an ostomy." Inpatient phase themes included "not knowing the best ostomy supplies to use," "challenges with ostomy appliance application," and "lack of patient acceptance and maladjustment." Postdischarge themes included "difficulty obtaining supplies," "challenges caring for inflamed skin," "variability in the utility of home healthcare," "missing outpatient resources," and "limited information on hydration and diet management." Themes were subsequently validated in focus groups. Conclusions: Patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals reported key perioperative barriers to obtaining, understanding, and utilizing ostomy care-related resources and education. These findings inform the development of interventions to improve ostomy care and education.

Indexed as

barriersostomyostomy carequalitativestoma care

Identifiers

PMID40134481
PMCPMC11932619

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.