Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134475›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Visualization of Intraoperative Pancreatic Leakage (ViP): The IDEAL Stage I First-in-human, Single-arm Clinical Pilot Trial of SmartPAN.

Thomas M Pausch, Magdalena Holze, Josefin El-Mahdy, Bodil Gesslein, Helena Ossmer Thedius, Anja Sander, Solveig Tenckhoff, Tom Sundermann, Jan Larmann, Pascal Probst and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Thomas M PauschFrom the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Magdalena HolzeFrom the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Josefin El-MahdyFrom the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Bodil GessleinMagle Chemoswed AB, Malmö, Sweden.
Helena Ossmer ThediusMagle Chemoswed AB, Malmö, Sweden.
Anja SanderInstitute of Medical Biometry, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Solveig TenckhoffStudy Centre of the German Society of Surgery (SDGC), Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
Tom SundermannInstitute of Forensic and Traffic Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Jan LarmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Pascal ProbstFrom the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Frank PiankaFrom the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rosa KlotzFrom the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
Thilo HackertFrom the Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The invisible fluid leaking from a partially resected pancreas is associated with complications including postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), calling for strategies to visualize intraoperative leakage. This single-arm, monocentric trial aims to evaluate the usefulness and safety of SmartPAN, a hydrogel that reacts to alkali pancreatic fluids by changing color and thus enables the surgeon to take immediate action to close leakage. Methods: Patients awaiting partial pancreatic resection for any indication were recruited to receive intraoperative SmartPAN application. Trial endpoints covered SmartPAN usability and safety according to reports completed by surgeons after each operation, laboratory measurements of nonbiodegradable compounds in body fluids, and clinical evaluations over 30 days of follow-up. Results: In total 42 patients were recruited to the trial and 29 received partial pancreatic resection with SmartPAN application according to protocol. All 16 attending surgeons rated SmartPAN as easy to learn and use, mostly agreeing that it was useful and that they intended to use it frequently. No adverse effects or complications were associated with SmartPAN, nor were its compounds detected in blood or abdominal fluids. Positive leakage response was detected in 10/29 surgeries. POPF developed in 7 patients, including 2 intraoperatively detected leakages, thereof 1 with targeted closure as well as 5 with no leakage detected. Conclusion: This study represents the first-in-human clinical trial of SmartPAN and the precursor to randomized controlled trials. The outcomes support SmartPAN's clinical usability and safety and showcase the device's potential to intraoperatively visualize precursors of POPF.

Indexed as

IDEALindicatorpancreaspostoperative pancreatic fistularesectionsurgery

Identifiers

PMID40134475
PMCPMC11932625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.