Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134472›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches2025

Not Only Caseload but Also Patient Selection Is Predictive of Mortality After Pancreatic Resection.

Rene Mantke, Barbara Seliger, Shuji Ogino, Markus W Büchler, Richard Hunger

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery open : perspectives of surgical history, education, and clinical approaches, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06390891 (Importance of Patient Characteristics in Identifying and Selecting Patients Suitable for Pancreatic Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06390891 completednot on this map

Importance of Patient Characteristics in Identifying and Selecting Patients Suitable for Pancreatic Resection

TypeobservationalSponsorMedizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor FontaneRan2010 to 2018Enrolled86,073ConditionsPancreas DiseaseArmsPersons with pancreatic resection in a hospital with at least 50 pancreatic resections annually (observational),, Persons with pancreatic resection in a hospital not performing at least 50 pancreatic resections annually (observational),
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rene MantkeFrom the Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
Barbara SeligerInstitute for Translational Immunology, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.
Shuji OginoDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA.
Markus W BüchlerBotton-Champalimaud Pancreatic Cancer Centre, Lisbon, Portugal.
Richard HungerFrom the Department of General Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Centralization of pancreatic surgery in high-volume centers is regarded as a key strategy in improving the outcome quality. However, the specific factors, in addition to higher case volumes, that influence inhospital mortality remain unclear. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, the German nationwide diagnostic-related groups statistics were analyzed for 86,073 patients with pancreatic resections. Hospitals performing at least 50 resections per year were identified as high-volume pancreatic centers (HVPCs). Statistical analyses compared crude and adjusted estimates of inhospital mortality for patients treated in HVPCs and non-HVPCs. A generalized mixed model was used for risk adjustment, considering various factors such as age group, sex, diagnosis, and comorbidities (ClinicalTrail.gov, NCT06390891). Results: A total of 24.2% (n = 20,798) of all pancreatic resections were performed in 23 HVPCs. The crude inhospital mortality for all patients undergoing resection was 9.0%. Crude inhospital mortality in HVPCs was 5.5% compared with 10.1% in non-HVPCs ( Conclusions: HVPCs have significantly lower inhospital mortality than the other hospitals. Nevertheless, the superior quality of outcome can be attributed not only to the enhanced expertise of the centers but also, at least in part, to a healthier patient population on average. However, the extent to which this patient selection is due to active selection by the practitioners or other causes remains unclear.

Indexed as

pancreatic centerspancreatic surgeryquality assurancevolume-outcome-relationship

Identifiers

PMID40134472
PMCPMC11932614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.