ArticleNAR genomics and bioinformatics2025
IPANEMAP Suite: a pipeline for probing-informed RNA structure modeling.
Article in NAR genomics and bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent Advances in Chemical Probing Strategies for RNA Structure Determination In Vivo.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026Review
- DEAD-box helicase intrinsically disordered domains and structural dynamics of HIV-1 RNA are required to reveal DDX3X catalytic efficiency.Nucleic acids research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In addition to their sequence, multiple functions of RNAs are encoded within their structure, which is often difficult to solve using physico-chemical methods. Incorporating low-resolution experimental data such as chemical probing into computational prediction significantly enhances RNA structure modeling accuracy. While medium- and high-throughput RNA structure probing techniques are widely accessible, the subsequent analysis process can be cumbersome, involving multiple software and manual data manipulation. In addition, the relevant interpretation of the data requires proper parameterization of the software and a strict consistency in the analysis pipeline. To streamline such workflows, we introduce IPANEMAP Suite, a comprehensive platform that guides users from chemically probing raw data to visually informative secondary structure models. IPANEMAP Suite seamlessly integrates various experimental datasets and facilitates comparative analysis of RNA structures under different conditions (footprinting), aiding in the study of protein or small molecule interactions with RNA. Here, we show that the unique ability of IPANEMAP Suite to perform integrative modeling using several chemical probing datasets with phylogenetic data can be instrumental in obtaining accurate secondary structure models. The platform's project-based approach ensures full traceability and generates publication-quality outputs, simplifying the entire RNA structure analysis process. IPANEMAP Suite is freely available at https://github.com/Sargueil-CiTCoM/ipasuite under a GPL-3.0 license.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.