ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
AI-enhanced profiling of phage-display-identified anti-TIM3 and anti-TIGIT novel antibodies.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phage Therapy in Combating Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: A Scoping Review.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Novel methods for neural IgG characterization and validation in autoimmune neurologic disorders.Journal of immunological methods · 2026Review
- Phage Display Technology: Design, Library Construction, and Panning Strategies for Antibody Development.Biomolecules & therapeutics · 2026Review
- Antibody screening for tumor and immune hotspot targets: The frontier of new methods and technologies.Journal of pharmaceutical analysis · 2026Review
- An efficient functional screening method for anti ATP hydrolase antibody based on fluorescent probes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Antibody discovery is a lengthy and labor-intensive process, requiring extensive laboratory work to ensure that an antibody demonstrates the appropriate efficacy, production, and safety characteristics necessary for its use as a therapeutic agent in human patients. Traditionally, this process begins with phage display or B-cells isolation campaigns, where affinity serves as the primary selection criterion. However, the initial leads identified through this approach lack sufficient characterization in terms of developability and epitope definition, which are typically performed at late stages. In this study, we present a pipeline that integrates early-stage phage display screening with AI-based characterization, enabling more informed decision-making throughout the selection process. Using immune checkpoints TIM3 and TIGIT as targets, we identified five initial leads exhibiting similar binding properties. Two of these leads were predicted to have poor developability profiles due to unfavorable surface physicochemical properties. Of the remaining three candidates, structural models of the complexes formed with their respective targets were generated for 2: T4 (against TIGIT) and 6E9 (against TIM3). The predicted epitopes allowed us to anticipate a competition with TIM3 and TIGIT binding partners, and to infer the antagonistic functions expected from these antibodies. This study lays the foundations of a multidimensional AI-driven selection of lead candidates derived from high throughput analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.