ArticleJournal of the Saudi Heart Association2025
A Saudi Heart Association Position Statement on the use of DOACs in Patients With Arterial and Venous Thrombosis.
Article in Journal of the Saudi Heart Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as non-inferior and effective alternatives to traditional anticoagulants in managing thromboembolic risks associated with various cardiovascular conditions. This position statement by the Saudi Heart Association (SHA) aims to provide guidance on the use of DOACs in the context of cardiovascular disease, particularly patients with arterial and venous thrombosis. Methods: A multidisciplinary panel of experts reviewed current evidence and international guidelines on DOACs, considering the local healthcare context in Saudi Arabia. The statement addresses the initiation, maintenance, interruption, and re-initiation of DOAC therapy across different patient populations. Results: DOACs are effective alternatives to traditional anticoagulants with a comparable or lower risk of bleeding and no requirement for frequent monitoring, making them more convenient for patients. It is important to regularly assess stroke risk (CHA2DS2-VASc score) and bleeding risk (HAS-BLED score) before initiating DOAC therapy and during the course of treatment, particularly in patients with changing clinical conditions. Specific factors warrant careful consideration for the use of DOACs in special patient populations. Recommendations are therefore provided for dosing adjustments in renal and hepatic impairment, alongside considerations for patients in different clinical scenarios such as those undergoing surgery or with malignancies. Conclusion: DOACs represent a valuable option for clinicians owing to their efficacy, safety and convenience compared to traditional anticoagulants. DOACs should be used based on individualized patient assessment, particularly regarding bleeding risk, stroke risk, and other comorbidities and clinical factors that may affect clinical outcomes. Adherence to the recommendations and guidance provided in this SHA statement is needed to enhance patient care and outcomes in Saudi Arabia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.