ArticleJournal of Indian Society of Periodontology
Comparative evaluation of the relative efficacy of autogenous tooth graft and demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft in the treatment of periodontal infrabony defects - A 6-month clinico-radiographic and biochemical study.
Article in Journal of Indian Society of Periodontology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: Demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) is a commonly used biomaterial in periodontal regeneration, while autogenous tooth graft (ATG) is a newer, nearly ideal biomaterial. In the literature, Aims: The aim of this study was to comparatively evaluate the efficacy of DFDBA and ATG in the management of periodontal infrabony defects clinically, radiologically, and biochemically. Settings and Design: In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 30 sites were selected based on the study criteria and randomly assigned to Group A (DFDBA) and Group B (ATG) by toss of a coin. Materials and Methods: Selected patients were evaluated 3-4 weeks after phase I therapy. Both the groups underwent open flap debridement: Group A sites were grafted with DFDBA and Group B with ATG. Clinico-radiological evaluation was performed at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months for pocket probing depth (PPD), clinical attachment level (CAL), and linear defect depth (LDD). Biochemical assessment was done using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for gingival crevicular fluid-alkaline phosphatase (GCF-ALP) at baseline and at 6 months. Statistical Analysis: Data obtained were subjected to parametric tests of significance (paired and unpaired Results: In intragroup comparison, highly significant differences ( Conclusions: Within the limitations of the present study, highly significant changes were noticed in all the parameters statistically in both the groups, with ATG showing higher bone fill and ongoing bone healing at 6 months postoperatively in the management of periodontal infrabony defects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.