Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134292›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025

Family Peace of Mind of Individuals Over 65 Years of Age With Chronic Diseases: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Emre Birinci, Ceyda Bayram, Ayşe Özkaraman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Emre BirinciAgeing Studies Application and Research Unit, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0001-9357-0106
Ceyda BayramAgeing Studies Application and Research Unit, Anadolu University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0009-0009-3826-9893
Ayşe ÖzkaramanDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Eskişehir, Türkiye.ORCID 0000-0002-0507-4100

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to assess the level of family peace among people over 65 who have chronic diseases and to look at the level of peace in relation to specific factors.

methodThis cross-sectional study was conducted between 1 July and 31 October 2023 in Internal Medicine policlinics and clinics of a hospital in Eskişehir/Türkiye. The data were collected using the 'Introduction Form', 'Self-Efficacy Scale' and 'Family Peace Scale'. While the data were given in the form of number, percentage, mean and percantage, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis T tests and Spearman's correlation analysis were applied in statistical analysis.

resultsThe total mean score of the family peace scale was 64.82 ± 9.041, the deep wear sub-dimension score was 34.11 ± 5.66, and the general contentment sub-dimension score was 30.71 ± 4.64. Age of the patients showed a significantly favourable association with the overall family peace score (r = 0.149; p = 0.019) (Table 4). Individual with dependents had statistically significantly lower total and sub-dimension scores of family peace (p = 0.004, p = 0.030, p = 0.007, respectively). It was found that family peace increased significantly in the positive direction as the level of self-efficacy of the patients increased (r = 0.389, p < 0.001).

conclusionFamily peace of mind is strongly associated with age, dependents and self-efficacy perceptions of individuals.

Indexed as

FamilyFamily RelationsAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsChronic DiseaseCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleSelf EfficacySurveys and QuestionnairesTurkeyagedchronic diseasesdependentsfamily peaceself‐efficacy

Identifiers

PMID40134292
PMCPMC11937873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.