Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134258›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2025

The Place of Evidence-Based Practices in Theoretical and Clinical Practice From the Perspective of Midwifery Students: A Qualitative Study.

Feyza Aktaş Reyhan, Elif Dağlı, Havva Yeşildere Sağlam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Feyza Aktaş ReyhanMidwifery Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7927-2361
Elif DağlıDepartment of Health Care Services, Abdi Sütcü Vocational School of Health Services, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4608-8904
Havva Yeşildere SağlamNursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kütahya University of Health Sciences, Kütahya, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8311-3745

Funding

The authors received no specific funding for this work.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was conducted to determine the views of future midwives about the place of evidence-based practices in midwifery education and practice. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis descriptive qualitative study was conducted with 28 student midwives who took the course of evidence-based practices in midwifery. Data were collected through in-depth and face-to-face interviews using an interview form. Content analysis technique was used to analyze the data.

resultsFour themes and thirteen sub-themes were identified in the data analysis. These themes are belief in evidence-based practice, differences in education and practice, barriers to evidence-based practices and implementation of evidence-based practices.

conclusionIn the current study, students' awareness of evidence-based midwifery practices and their ability to offer opinions and suggestions are related to the fact that they have taken the evidence-based practices course in their education. In this sense, it is important to increase the knowledge, awareness and skills of midwives by integrating evidence-based practices in the education curricula of future midwives.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEvidence-Based PracticeMidwiferyStudents, NursingAdultClinical CompetenceCurriculumFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInterviews as TopicPregnancyQualitative Researchevidence‐based practiceevidence‐based practice in midwiferymidwifestudent

Identifiers

PMID40134258
PMCPMC11937730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.