ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025
Rational Design for Monodisperse Gallium Nanoparticles by In Situ Monitoring with Small-Angle X-ray Scattering.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plasmonics of non-noble metals.RSC advances · 2026Review
- Solution-Phase Design of Emerging Nanomaterials.Chemistry of materials : a publication of the American Chemical Society · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colloidal chemistry is a well-known synthetic platform for producing size-uniform nanoparticles. However, the optimization of each material system still relies on a tedious trial-and-error approach in a multiparametric space, commonly referred to as design-of-experiments. This process is particularly laborious for emerging material classes for which only a handful of syntheses have been reported. Alternative approaches for the rational design of colloidal nanoparticles involve studying the reaction with in situ methods, thereby revealing the true underlying rules for the synthesis of monodisperse nanoparticles. Here, we focus on highly promising but little-studied colloidal gallium nanoparticles, using synchrotron-based small-angle X-ray scattering as a highly suitable in situ monitoring technique. We investigate the intertwined effects of process temperature, concentration of reactants, and the sterics of surface ligands during the hot-injection synthesis of gallium colloids. For quantitative comparison, we provide a description of gallium synthesis through the timestamps of partially overlapping reaction, nucleation, and growth stages. Our results reveal the key role of surface ligands in balancing the kinetics of nucleation and growth, as well as in enabling colloidal stability during the synthesis. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the large overlap between the nucleation and growth stages does not preclude the formation of monodisperse gallium nanoparticles. Our in situ experiments suggest several possible strategies for achieving size-uniform colloidal nanoparticles, thus enabling a rational design for the peculiar system of liquid metal nanodroplets and offering insights that can be extended to other monodisperse colloids prepared via hot-injection synthesis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.