[Clinical study of orelabrutinib combined with R-CHOP regimen for newly diagnosed high-risk non-GCB diffuse large B-cell lymphoma with extranodal involvement].

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Optimizing first-line therapy for double-expressor lymphoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis of novel agent-augmented R-CHOP regimens.Cancer cell international · 2026
   Review
2. [Efficacy and safety analysis of BTK inhibitors combined with R-CHOP regimen in newly diagnosed double-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi · 2026
   Article
3. Case Report: Diagnostic value of spectral CT in primary adrenal lymphoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2026
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as