ArticleYonsei medical journal2025
Deep Learning-Based Computer-Aided Diagnosis in Coronary Artery Calcium-Scoring CT for Pulmonary Nodule Detection: A Preliminary Study.
Article in Yonsei medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Missed Incidental Lung Cancer on Neck CT: Determinants and Impact on Diagnostic Delay and Stage Shift.Korean journal of radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the feasibility and utility of deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (DL-CAD) for the detection of pulmonary nodules on coronary artery calcium (CAC)-scoring computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 273 patients (aged 63.9±13.2 years; 129 men) who underwent CAC-scoring CT. A DL-CAD system based on thin-section images was used for pulmonary nodule detection, and two independent junior readers reviewed the standard CAC-scoring CT scans with and without referencing DL-CAD results. A reference standard was established through the consensus of two experienced radiologists. Sensitivity, positive predictive value, and F1-score were assessed on a per-nodule and per-patient basis. The patients' medical records were monitored until November 2023.
resultsA total of 269 nodules were identified in 129 patients. With DL-CAD assistance, the readers' sensitivity significantly improved (65% vs. 80% for reader 1; 82% vs. 86% for reader 2; all
conclusionDL-CAD based on thin-section images can assist less experienced readers in detecting pulmonary nodules on CAC-scoring CT scans, improving detection sensitivity without significantly increasing false-positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.