Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134038›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Failure to prevent classical scrapie after repeated decontamination of a barn.

Timm Konold, John Spiropoulos, Peter Bellerby, Hugh A Simmons

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Timm KonoldAnimal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge, Department of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Addlestone, UK. Timm.Konold@apha.gov.uk.
John SpiropoulosAnimal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge, Department of Pathology and Animal Sciences, Addlestone, UK.
Peter BellerbyAnimal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge, National Science Centre for Animal Health, Addlestone, UK.
Hugh A SimmonsAnimal and Plant Health Agency Weybridge, National Science Centre for Animal Health, Addlestone, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrions, the causative agent of scrapie in sheep, are extremely resistant to disinfection and can remain biologically active for years, which makes it challenging to prevent re-infection of susceptible animals on farms after a scrapie outbreak. The present study investigated the effectiveness of disinfection of a barn that previously housed scrapie-affected sheep as part of the husbandry of scrapie infected sheep on the farm. The barn was decontaminated with sodium hypochlorite for four times the recommended exposure time. Two cohorts, consisting of 25 and 21 sheep, with susceptible prion protein genotypes (VRQ/VRQ), born 2 years apart, were housed in the barn and infection monitored by examination of rectal biopsies.

resultsOne sheep from the first cohort and four from the second were found to be infected from 775 (first cohort) and 550 days (second cohort) post exposure. It is concluded that decontamination with sodium hypochlorite at the recommended concentration and longer exposure time did not prevent re-infection of susceptible sheep. Disinfection of contaminated premises to eradicate scrapie continues to be a challenge.

Indexed as

DecontaminationDisinfectionHousing, AnimalScrapieSodium HypochloriteAnimalsDisinfectantsSheepDisinfectantsSodium HypochloriteBioassayDecontaminationPrionScrapieSheepSodium hypochloriteTransmissible spongiform encephalopathy

Identifiers

PMID40134038
PMCPMC11938569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.