Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40134037›Full record

ArticleMovement ecology2025

Shortening migration by 4500 km does not affect nesting phenology or increase nest success for black brant (Branta bernicla nigricans) breeding in Arctic and subarctic Alaska.

Toshio D Matsuoka, Vijay P Patil, Jerry W Hupp, Alan G Leach, John A Reed, James S Sedinger, David H Ward

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Movement ecology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Toshio D MatsuokaU.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4235-2614
Vijay P PatilU.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA. vpatil@usgs.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9357-194X
Jerry W HuppU.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6439-3910
Alan G LeachDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV, 89557, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7645-8312
John A ReedU.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3239-6906
James S SedingerDepartment of Natural Resources and Environmental Science, University of Nevada Reno, 1664 N. Virginia Street, Reno, NV, 89557, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2912-5144
David H WardU.S. Geological Survey, Alaska Science Center, 4210 University Drive, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5242-2526

Funding

Arctic Goose Joint Venture 129National Science Foundation DEB 0743132National Science Foundation DEB 1252656
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSince the 1980s, Pacific Black Brant (Branta bernicla nigricans, hereafter brant) have shifted their winter distribution northward from Mexico to Alaska (approximately 4500 km) with changes in climate. Alongside this shift, the primary breeding population of brant has declined. To understand the population-level implications of the changing migration strategy of brant, it is important to connect movement and demographic data. Our objectives were to calculate migratory connectivity, a measure of spatial and temporal overlap during the non-breeding period, for Arctic and subarctic breeding populations of brant, and to determine if variation in migration strategies affected nesting phenology and nest survival.

methodsWe derived a migratory network using light-level geolocator migration tracks from an Arctic site (Colville River Delta) and a subarctic site (Tutakoke River) in Alaska. Using this network, we quantified the migratory connectivity of the two populations during the winter. We also compared nest success rates among brant that used different combinations of winter sites and breeding sites.

resultsThe two breeding populations were well mixed during the winter, as indicated by a migratory connectivity score close to 0 (- 0.06) at the primary wintering sites of Izembek Lagoon, Alaska (n = 11 brant) and Baja California, Mexico (n = 48). However, Arctic birds were more likely to migrate the shorter distance to Izembek (transition probability = 0.24) compared to subarctic birds (transition probability = 0.09). Nest survival for both breeding populations was relatively high (0.88-0.92), and we did not detect an effect of wintering site on nest success the following year.

conclusionsNest survival of brant did not differ among brant that used wintering sites despite a 4500 km difference in migration distances. Our results also suggested that the growing Arctic breeding population is unlikely to compensate for declines in the larger breeding population of brant in the subarctic. However, this study took place in 2011-2014 and wintering at Izembek Lagoon may have greater implications for reproductive success under future climate conditions.

Indexed as

AlaskaArcticBrantGeolocatorsMigrationMigratory networkNest survivalSubarctic

Identifiers

PMID40134037
PMCPMC11938651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.