Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133970›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

Effectiveness of naloxone distribution in community settings to reduce opioid overdose deaths among people who use drugs: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Leah S Fischer, Alice Asher, Renee Stein, Jeffrey Becasen, Amanda Doreson, Jonathan Mermin, Martin I Meltzer, Brian R Edlin

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Opioid-Induced Nodding-Not a Nice Nap.Acta scientific neurology · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Suzetrigine for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department: A First-in-Class NaV1.8 Blocker.Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Leah S FischerNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, United States of America. lsfischer@cdc.gov.
Alice AsherNational Center for HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Prevention, Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Renee SteinNational Center for HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Prevention, Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Jeffrey BecasenNational Center for HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Prevention, Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Amanda DoresonNational Center for HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Prevention, Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Jonathan MerminNational Center for HIV/AIDS, STD and TB Prevention, Viral Hepatitis, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Martin I MeltzerNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.
Brian R EdlinNational Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases, Atlanta, GA, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is estimated that over 111,000 people in the U.S. died from a drug overdose in the twelve-month period ending in July 2023. More than three-quarters of those deaths were attributed to opioids. Naloxone has long been available in healthcare facilities to reverse opioid overdose rapidly and safely but is not universally accessible for use in community settings where overdoses occur. We conducted a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of overdose education and naloxone distribution (OEND) programs in three types of community settings to reduce overdose deaths among people who use opioids nonmedically.

methodsWe systematically searched electronic databases, including Medline (OVID), Embase (OVID), Psycinfo (OVID), and Global Health (OVID), for peer-reviewed studies of OEND programs published during 2003-2018 (Group 1) that reported overdose outcomes individual level survivals or deaths immediately following naloxone administration. The PRISMA checklist guided screening, quality assessment, and data abstraction. We later identified studies published during 2018-2022 (Group 2), when drug usage and fentanyl-related overdose deaths notably increased, differed from earlier ones. We conducted meta-analyses on both Groups using random effects models to estimate summary survival proportions.

resultsAmong the 44 Group 1 studies published during 2003-2018, survival did not differ by time (year), location, naloxone dose, or route of administration, but studies of OEND programs serving people who use drugs reported 98.3% (95% CI: 97.5-98.8) survival; those serving family of people who use drugs or other community members reported 95.0% (95% CI: 91.4-97.1) survival; and those for police reported 92.4% (95% CI: 88.9-94.8) survival (p < 0.01). Five Group 2 studies (2018-2022) yielded similar results.

conclusionsCommunity-based naloxone distribution programs can be effective in preventing opioid overdose deaths. The paper demonstrates that in the face of increasing overdose deaths over time, survival after naloxone administration has been sustained. The very high survival rates provide clear evidence for public health to continue efforts to expand channels for naloxone distribution in community settings.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsOpiate OverdoseHumansNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsInjection drug useNaloxoneOpioidOverdosePolicePreventionSyringe services programsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40133970
PMCPMC11934755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.