ArticleBMC psychology2025
Exploring the influence of cognitive factors among Chinese parents on the sustainability of children's digital education.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The applicability of the new media platform "Urological Surgery Learning Notes" in continuing medical education for urologists.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Exploring the psychological factors influencing intention to use AI virtual companions: an SEM-ANN study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Parental adjustment to AI learning tools during the preschool-to-primary transition: a qualitative study in China.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Psychological mechanisms linking AI hallucinations to user trust and behavioral intentions toward AI-generated videos: an S-O-R perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe proliferation of mobile internet requires children's educational software to be evaluated rigorously and implemented effectively to ensure quality and sustainable development. Understanding the determinants of parents' decisions to sustain the use of such tools is critical with respect to efforts to optimize software design, develop frameworks for relevant policies, and improve digital education strategies. RESEARCH
methodsA theoretical model that integrates the expectation confirmation model (ECM) with the technology acceptance model (TAM) was developed to predict parents' continuance intentions. Data collected from 276 Chinese parents were analysed via structural equation modelling (SEM) with the goal of validating the proposed hypotheses.
findingsPerceived playability, usefulness, social influence, and satisfaction significantly predict continuance intention. Expectation confirmation positively influences playability, ease of use, and satisfaction while reducing perceived risk, although it does not affect continuance decisions directly.
conclusionChinese parents prioritize educational efficacy and interactivity in terms of the apps used by their children; thus, developers should establish a balance between pedagogical value and engagement. Social influence serves as a pivotal driver of adoption, thus highlighting the need for reliable information dissemination. Although perceived risk has only a minimal impact in this context, proactive measures to safeguard content quality and privacy remain imperative.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.