Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133938›Full record

ArticlePerioperative medicine (London, England)2025

Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on lung cancer surgery outcomes: a matched-case analysis.

Matar Alzahrani, Rajnikant Mehta, Salma Kadiri, Saffana Algaeed, Aya Osman, Mohammed Alsanad, Joan Duda, Fang Gao, Babu Naidu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Perioperative medicine (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Matar AlzahraniCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. rainalzahrani@gmail.com.
Rajnikant MehtaWolfson Institute of Population Health, University of London, Mile End, Queen Mary, UK.
Salma KadiriThoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Saffana AlgaeedKing Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Aya OsmanThoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mohammed AlsanadCollege of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Joan DudaSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Fang GaoInstitution of Inflammation and Aging, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Babu NaiduInstitution of Inflammation and Aging, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulmonary rehabilitation programs for COPD patients are extensively accessible throughout the UK and have demonstrated efficacy in enhancing outcomes, including recovery from exacerbations. Numerous lung cancer surgery patients possess COPD, and the surgery may be regarded as a definitive aggravation of COPD. It is ambiguous in practical application whether referral to pulmonary rehabilitation programs enhances surgical and patient-reported results. We want to address this topic by conducting a propensity-score analysis (PSA) of participants in an enriched cohort trial. Methods An enriched cohort research was conducted, providing rehabilitation both pre- and post-surgery pragmatically through local pulmonary rehabilitation providers for patients undergoing lung cancer resection, and compared to a contemporaneous control group receiving standard treatment. The study enrolled 873 participants (pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) n = 135, non-intervention or control (NG) n = 738). Regression analyses for exposed and unexposed matching, effect estimation, and standard error estimations were conducted.Results A total of 114 participants were matched PR (n = 57) and NG (n = 57). The multivariate-linear regression indicated a reduction in length of stay (LOS) of 0.2 days of LOS compared to the usual care group (EE = - 0.20), and that reduction could potentially go up to 1.8 days (95% CI = - 1.8-1.6). The multivariate log-binomial regression revealed that PR had a reduction of 60% postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) rate (EE = - 0.60, 95% CI = - 1.8-0.5). Lastly, the multivariate-linear regression showed an improvement in quality of life 6 weeks and 6 months after surgery (QoL) in patients in PR, especially in the physical functioning score in which an improvement of 6.6% was noted for the PR group compared to the NG group following surgery (EE = 6.6). Conclusion Participation in "real world" pulmonary rehabilitation prior to and following surgery seems to yield improved patient and clinical results post-lung cancer surgery. Nonetheless, prompt access to pulmonary rehabilitation may be a significant challenge following COVID.

Indexed as

Hospital length of stayPostoperative pulmonary complicationsPrehabilitationPropensity score analysisPulmonary rehabilitationQuality of lifeRehabilitation programs

Identifiers

PMID40133938
PMCPMC11934484

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.