ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study.
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nurse-led care model to overcome migration-related language barriers in people with cancer (BMJ open · 2026Article
- Language as a barrier to colorectal cancer screening in flanders: an ecological study.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundDespite its potential with regard to the prevention and early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC), participation in the organized CRC screening programme of the Belgian region of Flanders is suboptimal. The role of language discordance as a determinant of screening participation in Europe is poorly understood, despite being identified as a potential barrier in qualitative and non-European studies.
methodsIn an ecological study analysing data on the level of Flemish municipalities (n = 300) from 2016 to 2021, we investigated whether the proportion of non-Dutch speakers at home is correlated with the response rate to CRC screening programme invitations and/or the total CRC screening coverage using multiple linear regression. We also performed Kruskal-Wallis tests and Dunn's tests to examine municipal differences in screening based on their adjacency to the regions of Brussels and Wallonia.
resultsAfter adjusting for confounders, the proportion of secondary school pupils that primarily speak a language other than Dutch at home was associated with a lower screening response rate (β = -0.327, 95% CI -0.359; -0.296)) and lower total screening coverage (β = -0.195, 95% CI -0.219; -0.171). Response rates and coverage were higher in municipalities at least two municipalities away from the border with Wallonia, Brussels or France. Our findings suggest that a high proportion of French speakers is particularly indicative of linguistic barriers to screening in Flemish municipalities (β = -0.358, 95% CI -0.397; -0.319 for response rate and β = -0.213, 95% CI -0.238; -0.188 for total coverage).
conclusionOur study highlights the need to consider potential linguistic challenges when optimizing CRC screening policies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.