Trial reportBMC medical education2025
Effect of flipped classroom to anesthesia crisis management simulation education: a quasi-experimental study.
Trial report in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Perceptions, and Career Interest in Anesthesiology among MBBS Students: Impact of an Operation Theater-only Elective.Annals of African medicine · 2026Article
- Enhancing competency and self-directed learning in anesthesiology residency: an outcome-based education model integrating online-offline hybrid teaching and mind mapping: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile simulation is widely employed in anesthesia crisis management training, its effectiveness is often hindered by lack of preparation. Flipped classroom (FC) is a novel teaching method that encourages active student engagement and preparation. We aim to investigate whether FC could enhance the residents' engagement in preparation activities and improve the learning outcomes in anesthesia crisis management simulation.
methodsThis quasi-experimental study included anesthesiology residents from the anesthesiology department, Shanghai General Hospital between January 2023 and July 2023. The participants were randomly divided into the FC group and the conventional lecture (CL) group. The primary outcome was the Anesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) scores of all participants. Secondary outcomes included crisis response performance, theoretical test scores, and time spent on training-related activities.
resultsA total of 40 anesthesiology residents in their first two postgraduation years at Shanghai General Hospital were recruited for analysis. The FC group (n = 20) achieved significantly higher overall ANTS scores (FC vs. CL: 11.95 ± 2.14 vs. 9.55 ± 2.40, p = 0.002) than the CL group. The FC group had higher correct response rates in two out of six observational checkpoints in the simulation (FC vs. CL: 'Recognize acute pulmonary embolism and deal with it accordingly', 95% vs. 60%, p = 0.020; 'Provide circulatory support and heparin treatment', 100% vs. 75%, p = 0.047). The FC group also obtained higher post-training theoretical test scores (FC vs. CL: 90.9 ± 4.8 vs. 84.8 ± 7.8, p = 0.005) than the CL group. While the FC group spent more time studying before the simulation session (FC vs. CL (mean [min, max]): 2.6 [1.3, 3.6] vs. 1.3 [0.3, 2.3], p < 0.0001), there was no significant difference in total studying time between the two groups (FC vs. CL (mean [min, max]): 3.6 [2, 5.6] vs. 3.4 [1.8, 4.9], p = 0.418).
conclusionFC may improve the learning performance in the management of perioperative pulmonary embolism within anesthesia crisis management simulation training compared to CL-based learning.
trial registrationThe study was registered with No. ChiCTR2300070086.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.