ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Assessing the role of mega cisterna magna in criminal responsibility: implications for neurocognitive disorders in forensic evaluations.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article explores the intersection of neurocognitive disorders and criminal behavior, highlighting the significant role of conditions such as traumatic brain injury (TBI), substance misuse, and neurodegenerative diseases in cognitive decline and associated criminal activities. We present three case studies of patients with mega cisterna magna diagnosed through imaging, discussing their legal proceedings and the impact of their cognitive impairments on criminal responsibility. The study underscores the prevalence of neurocognitive disorders among incarcerated and psychiatrically assessed individuals, suggesting these conditions are often underdiagnosed in forensic settings. Our findings indicate a critical need for comprehensive neurocognitive assessments to better understand and manage the influence of neurological disorders on behavior and legal responsibility. The cases demonstrate how neurocognitive impairments, particularly mega cisterna magna, can influence behavior and complicate the assessment of criminal responsibility, advocating for enhanced diagnostic practices and tailored treatment approaches in forensic psychiatry. This study calls for more focused research on neurocognitive disorders within forensic populations to refine diagnostic and treatment strategies, ultimately aiming to improve legal adjudications and clinical outcomes for affected individuals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.