ArticleBMC health services research2025
A community-focused cervical and breast cancer screening program using a sustainable funding model in a training center in Ghana.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Barriers and Facilitators Influencing National Scaleup of a Women's Cancer Early Detection Program in Rwanda: Perspectives of Policymakers, Program Leaders, and Clinicians.JCO global oncology · 2026Article
- Challenges of scaling up cervical cancer screening in Ethiopia: a qualitative socio-ecological study.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Cervical leukoplakia in Ghana: Unveiling diagnostic challenges and informing low-resource screening strategies.PloS one · 2026Observational
- Enhancing Breast Cancer Screening Uptake: A Community-based Intervention in Southeast Wolverhampton, UK.Cureus · 2025Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cervical cancer screening utilization among female healthcare professionals in the Tamale Metropolis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile Ghana prepares to roll out a nationwide breast and cervical (pre)cancer screening policy, it is necessary to continuously document high-impact and scalable models. Over the years, the Cervical Cancer Prevention and Training Centre (CCPTC), Battor, has utilized a sustainable funding model in which each trainee pays for 15 women to be screened with visual inspection with acetic acid. This paper details the framework of community-focused trainer-led coordinated cervical and breast screening outreaches carried out under this model. The paper further reports the outcomes of screening over a 5-year period and discusses the advantages and shortcomings of the model in an effort to make recommendations for the development and scale-up of combined cervical and breast screening in a largely opportunistic setting.
methodsThis descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study investigated women who underwent cervical precancer screening using visual inspection with acetic acid or mobile colposcopy and/or high-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) DNA testing between September 2017 and July 2022 (n = 2,273) and clinical breast examination between June 2021 and March 2023 (n = 622) by trainees of the CCPTC on outreaches conducted primarily to solidify their practical skills. For women screened using HPV DNA testing and visual inspection, respectively, the study explored factors associated with HPV infection or visual inspection 'positivity' using nominal logistic regression.
resultsThe overall prevalence of hr-HPV infection was 14.3% (95% CI, 10.0-19.6) among women with valid results for hr-HPV DNA testing, while the overall visual inspection 'positivity' rate was 2.8% (95% CI, 2.2-3.6). After controlling for age, earning an income was the only factor associated with hr-HPV infection (aOR = 3.00; 95% CI, 1.35 - 6.64; p-value = 0.007). Factors associated with visual inspection 'positivity' after adjusting for age were: number of births (aOR = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.52 - 0.97; p-value = 0.029), number of lifetime pregnancies (aOR = 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67 - 0.93; p-value = 0.004), being single (aOR = 2.42; 95% CI, 1.19 - 4.90; p-value = 0.014), and earning an income (aOR = 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26 - 0.74; p-value = 0.002). Breast examination showed clinically significant masses in 20 women (3.2%), lymphadenopathy in 13 (2.1%), and nipple discharge in 37 women (6.0%) and only n = 3/67 women (4.5%) requiring referral followed up for further management.
conclusionWhile the outreach approach adopted by the CCPTC has myriad benefits, further evidence-based studies and structured program evaluations are needed to assess if this approach can be adopted on a large scale, especially without the backing of a training institution with the needed resources and capacity to investigate and manage screen positives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.