Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133920›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2025

The scale of attitudes toward workplace sexual harassment disclosure: development and validation among Iranian nurses.

Samaneh Behzadi Fard, Mohammad Reza Baneshi, Farideh Razban, Mahlagha Dehghan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Samaneh Behzadi FardNursing Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4503-6149
Mohammad Reza BaneshiModeling in Health Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6405-8688
Farideh RazbanDepartment of Critical Care Nursing, Razi Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3381-2529
Mahlagha DehghanReproductive and Family Health Research Center, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran. m_dehghan86@yahoo.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4205-829X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWorkplace sexual harassment (WSH) is a global concern among nurses. Understanding nurses' attitudes toward disclosing WSH is essential for addressing this issue. Therefore, this study aimed to develop and validate a scale measuring Iranian nurses' attitudes toward WSH disclosure.

methodsThis study is the second phase of a mixed-methods study. The initial qualitative phase explored nurses' attitudes toward WSH disclosure using conventional content analysis. This qualitative data and existing literature were examined to develop the scale. In the quantitative phase, the scale underwent psychometric evaluation, including content validity (assessed by 14 experts), face validity (evaluated by 15 nurses), construct validity (tested with 330 nurses from hospitals affiliated with Kerman University of Medical Sciences), and reliability [measured using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's Omega, Intraclass Correlation Coefficient, and Standard Error of Measurement (SEM)].

resultsThe developed 18-item scale effectively captures four key dimensions related to nurses' attitudes toward WSH disclosure: concerns about personality consequences, concerns about processes and organizational outcomes, tendency toward alternative strategies, and ethical beliefs about the disclosure of WSH. This scale accounted for 54.27% of the overall variance. The strong correlation between the Nurses' Attitudes toward Disclosure of Workplace Sexual Harassment Scale (NAWSHD-S) and the Nurses Sexual Harassment Scale (NSHS) (r = 0.684) confirmed convergent validity. Furthermore, the scale demonstrated good reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.774, an Omega coefficient of 0.770, an ICC of 0.802, and an SEM of 1.87.

conclusionConsidering the significant impact of WSH on nurses, assessing their attitudes toward the disclosure of WSH is crucial for developing preventive interventions. This study indicates the psychometric properties of the 18-item NAWSHD-S, making it a valuable scale for use in clinical settings. It is recommended that future research within the nursing community be conducted to validate these findings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

DisclosureNursesPsychometricsScaleSexual harassmentWorkplace

Identifiers

PMID40133920
PMCPMC11934692

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.