ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Risk factors for postpartum depression in pregnant women with allergic rhinitis: a retrospective study.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveAllergic rhinitis can cause symptoms to worsen after pregnancy and may cause problems such as postpartum depression. The goal of this study was to investigate the factors that influence postpartum depression in pregnant women with allergic rhinitis (AR).
methodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study that included women with AR (based on self-reports) between June 2015 to June 2019 in Harvard University Partners Healthcare Systems (PARTNERS) in the USA. The study group was divided into postpartum depression and non-postpartum depression. Routine clinical and laboratory information was collected. Univariate and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO, employed for predictor selection) regression analysis was used to study associations between AR during pollen seasons and adverse outcomes. Additionally, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluates discriminative ability by the area under the ROC curve (AUC). The calibration curve (DCA) was conducted to determine the clinical utility and benefit of the nomogram.
resultsA total of 216 pregnant women with AR participated in this study. Univariate analysis showed that 7 indicators were significantly different (P < 0.05). LASSO and multivariable regression identified four predictors to construct a nomogram for PPD in pregnant women with AR, the four selected risk predictors are as follows: pollen season pregnancy (OR = 1.514, 95%CI: 0.771-2.973), history of preterm birth (OR = 2.723, 95%CI: 1.157-6.406), number of pregnancies (OR = 2.104, 95%CI: 1.356-3.267), anti-allergy medication during pregnancy (OR = 2.975, 95%CI: 1.521-5.819). The nomogram displayed good discrimination, with AUC of 0.732 (95% CI: 0.657-0.808). The risk of postpartum depression increased with the increasing risk score of predictive nomogram. The calibration curve and DCA present optimal predictive power.
conclusionsWe highlighted the comorbidity of AR and postpartum depression, and suggested that a multidisciplinary consideration between allergists and obstetricians or midwives is needed to ensure that pregnant women consult experts to reduce AR symptoms. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2018P002646.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.