ArticleBMC public health2025
Using participatory video to generate active agents of change at community level to address the drivers of antimicrobial resistance in two settings in Nepal.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe present a community-based videomaking project that used Participatory Video (PV) to co-produce community-led resources to address the issue of antimicrobial resistance in Nepal. Specifically, this paper highlights the potential of PV as a way of generating community champions that can become active 'agents of change'.
methodsA total of 20 participants took part in PV workshops in Nepal across two settings; one urban and one peri-urban site. Participants were trained in video production and took part in interactive learning sessions on AMR. Participants were supported to create and showcase their own videos on AMR in their community. All workshops were recorded and a series of focus group discussions and interviews were undertaken to evaluate the project.
resultsParticipants considered PV to be a positive experience, both in terms of personal development and their ability to understand and address community-level drivers of AMR. They emphasised how the project helped them to become proactive in addressing AMR and also to be 'seen' by policy makers and other members of their community who they did not feel would generally take notice of them. Conversely, policymakers, as well as other members of the participants' communities, were impressed by the quality of the work produced, which, in turn, made them pay attention to the messages communicated in the videos.
conclusionsCARAN highlights the potential of PV as a way of creating community-level champions to help address the drivers of AMR. More work is required to understand the longer-term value of creating such champions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.