ArticleBMC nursing2025
Challenges and best practices for moving forward in interprofessional collaboration in critical care units: nurses' perspectives.
Article in BMC nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Teaching Acute Coronary Syndrome High-Risk ECG Interpretation and Clinical Decision-Making Through FOAMed Videos and Podcast Versus Print-Based Materials Among Emergency Care Providers: Randomized Controlled Mixed Methods Trial.JMIR medical education · 2026Trial
- Challenges and Support Strategies for Intensive Care Unit Nurses in the Organ Donation Process: A Scoping Review.Journal of advanced nursing · 2026Article
- Article
- Contextualising ventilation decisions: an ethnographic study of factors shaping interprofessional decision-making.BMC nursing · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe positive outcomes for critically ill patients rely on effective interprofessional collaboration (IPC), which depends on the collective expertise and skill of the critical care team (CCT) working cohesively and collaboratively to provide patients with high-quality, safe care.
aims(1) To determine the challenges to interprofessional collaboration in critical care units as perceived by the diploma versus. baccalaureate nurses (2) To explore best practices suggested by nurses for improving IPC.
methodsA descriptive design using a four-point scale survey and two open-ended questions was employed to collect the data from 125 nurses in three critical care medicine units at a university hospital. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Pearson correlations, with 𝑝 < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Open-ended questions were analyzed by content analysis.
resultsThe results demonstrated a substantial difference between nurses who graduated from nursing faculties and hold baccalaureate degrees and nurses who graduated from nursing institutions and hold diploma degrees in agreement and satisfaction with the relations and collaboration with the physicians. Additionally, a significant correlation was seen between the level of nurses' education and the limited time caused by heavy workloads and the nurses' perspectives toward their relations with physicians. A content analysis of the nurses' texts revealed that five categories have emerged as nurses' suggestions to keep up the best practices for moving forward in the nurse-physician collaboration: changing the physician's attitude toward the nurses, improving communication skills, role clarification, interprofessional conflict resolution, and support and motivation.
conclusionsOn the one hand, nurses with baccalaureate degrees expressed lower satisfaction with IPC. On the other hand, five categories were suggested by the nurses as best practices for moving forward in their collaboration with the physicians, these include physician attitudes toward the nurses, communication tools and skills, nurses' roles clarification, interprofessional conflict resolution, and support and motivation. Implementation of the results of the current study will improve patient outcomes by preventing oversights, medication errors, and redundant interventions. In addition to creating relaxed working conditions, improving the morale of the healthcare team, job satisfaction, and decreased staff turnover.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.