Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133868›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Thyroid nodule classification in ultrasound imaging using deep transfer learning.

Yan Xu, Mingmin Xu, Zhe Geng, Jie Liu, Bin Meng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Thyroid intelligent diagnosis based on THMSNet.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Yan XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, No.309 Shuangyuan Road, Jiaxing, 314001, China.
Mingmin XuDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, No.309 Shuangyuan Road, Jiaxing, 314001, China.
Zhe GengDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, No.309 Shuangyuan Road, Jiaxing, 314001, China.
Jie LiuInterventional Cancer Institute of Chinese Integrative Medicine, Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200062, China. liujie_w@sina.com.
Bin MengDepartment of Ultrasound, Zhejiang Rongjun Hospital, No.309 Shuangyuan Road, Jiaxing, 314001, China. netboysky@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe accurate diagnosis of thyroid nodules represents a critical and frequently encountered challenge in clinical practice, necessitating enhanced precision in diagnostic methodologies. In this study, we investigate the predictive efficacy of distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid nodules by employing traditional machine learning algorithms and a deep transfer learning model, aiming to advance the diagnostic paradigm in this field.

methodsIn this retrospective study, ITK-Snap software was utilized for image preprocessing and feature extraction from thyroid nodules. Feature screening and dimensionality reduction were conducted using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression method. To identify the optimal model, both traditional machine learning and transfer learning approaches were employed, followed by model fusion using post-fusion techniques. The performance of the model was rigorously evaluated through the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curve analysis, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsA total of 1134 images from 630 cases of thyroid nodules were included in this study, comprising 589 benign nodules and 545 malignant nodules. Through comparative analysis, the support vector machine (SVM), which demonstrated the best diagnostic performance among traditional machine learning models, and the Inception V3 convolutional neural network model, based on transfer learning, were selected for model construction. The SVM model achieved an AUC of 0.748 (95% CI: 0.684-0.811) for diagnosing malignant thyroid nodules, while the Inception V3 transfer learning model yielded an AUC of 0.763 (95% CI: 0.702-0.825). Following model fusion, the AUC improved to 0.783 (95% CI: 0.724-0.841). The difference in performance between the fusion model and the traditional machine learning model was statistically significant (p = 0.036). Decision curve analysis (DCA) further confirmed that the fusion model exhibits superior clinical utility, highlighting its potential for practical application in thyroid nodule diagnosis.

conclusionOur findings demonstrate that the fusion model, which integrates a convolutional neural network (CNN) with traditional machine learning and deep transfer learning techniques, can effectively differentiate between benign and malignant thyroid nodules through the analysis of ultrasound images. This model fusion approach significantly optimizes and enhances diagnostic performance, offering a robust and intelligent tool for the clinical detection of thyroid diseases.

Indexed as

Deep LearningThyroid NeoplasmsThyroid NoduleAdultFemaleHumansMachine LearningMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesROC CurveSupport Vector MachineUltrasonographyClassificationDeep learningMachine learningThyroidTransfer learningUltrasound image

Identifiers

PMID40133868
PMCPMC11938658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.