ArticleBMC psychiatry2025
Machine learning-driven development of a stratified CES-D screening system: optimizing depression assessment through adaptive item selection.
Article in BMC psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Illuminating the complex interplay of risk factors for depression symptoms within a large-scale US longitudinal cohort.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2026Article
- A generative two-stage semantic intermediary framework for explainable mental health early warning in higher education.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo develop a stratified screening tool through machine learning approaches for the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-20) while maintaining diagnostic accuracy, addressing the efficiency limitations in large-scale applications.
methodsData were derived from the Chinese Psychological Health Guard Project (primary sample: n = 179,877; age 9-18) and China Labor-force Dynamics Survey (validation samples across age spans). We employed a two-stage machine learning approach: first applying Recursive Feature Elimination with multiple linear regression to identify core predictive items for total depression scores, followed by logistic regression for optimizing depression classification (CES-D ≥ 16). Model performance was systematically evaluated through discrimination (ROC analysis), calibration (Brier score), and clinical utility analyses (decision curve analysis), with additional validation using random forest and support vector machine algorithms across independent samples.
resultsThe resulting stratified screening system consists of an initial four-item rapid screening layer (encompassing emotional, cognitive, and interpersonal dimensions) for detecting probable depression (AUC = 0.982, sensitivity = 0.945, specificity = 0.926), followed by an enhanced assessment layer with five additional items. Together, these nine items enable accurate prediction of the full CES-D-20 total score (R
conclusionsThis study contributes to the refinement of CES-D by developing a machine learning-derived stratified screening version, offering an efficient and reliable approach that optimizes assessment burden while maintaining excellent psychometric properties. The stratified design makes it particularly valuable for large-scale mental health screening programs, enabling efficient risk stratification and targeted assessment allocation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.