ArticleBMC medical imaging2025
Accuracy of ultrasonographic transcerebellar diameter for dating in third trimester of pregnancy in Nigerian women: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAccurate prediction of foetal gestational age is of critical importance as it can positively affect the outcome of pregnancy. Routine sonographic estimation of gestational age using biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length is popular but has limitations especially when used as a singly or in late pregnancy. Often pregnant women in low-middle-income countries like Nigeria register for antenatal care late in pregnancy, necessitating the need for a single, cost-effective parameter that requires minimal skills to measure gestational age accurately in late pregnancies. This study examined the accuracy of ultrasonographic transcerebellar diameter compared to other foetal biometric parameters for dating in third trimester of pregnancy. METHODOLOGY: An analytic cross-sectional study conducted at Lagos University Teaching Hospital, Idi-Araba, Lagos, on 110 pregnant women in their third trimester. Data was collected using an interviewer administered questionnaire. Transabdominal ultrasound scan was done to determine the gestational age by measuring the biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, femur length and transcerebellar diameter. Spearman's correlation coefficient was used to determine the correlation between the biometric measurements; Accuracy was determine using gestational age from menstrual date as gold standard and comparisons made using Chi square test.
resultsMean age of participants was 31.5 ± 5.8 years; mean gestational age 236 ± 25 days. Compared to biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length, transcerebellar diameter correlates best with gestational age (r = 0.8837, p < 0.001). At an error margin of ± 2weeks, transcerebellar diameter had a high predictive accuracy of 84.6%, though significantly less than that for abdominal circumference alone, 86.4% (p = 0.003), and also less than that for all four well known foetal biometric parameters (biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference, and femur length) combined, 85.5% (p < 0.001).
conclusionTranscerebellar diameter has a better correlation with gestational age than other routine foetal biometric parameters and has high predictive accuracy for dating in third trimester of pregnancy. It may thus play a relevant role in low resource settings where there is shortage of staff and limited skills in obstetric ultrasonography. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable for this study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.