ArticleBMC anesthesiology2025
Carotid peak flow velocity variation as a surrogate of aortic peak flow velocity variation in a pediatric population.
Article in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of preload responsiveness by variation in peak aortic flow velocity in suprasternal window: A novel approach.Indian journal of anaesthesia · 2026Article
- Ultrasound-derived velocity variations predict fluid responsiveness in critically ill pediatric oncology patients.Physiological reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCarotid peak velocity variation (ΔVpeak
aimAnalyze the concordance and the tracking ability of ΔVpeak
methodsPatients from 0 to 12 years were included. Three groups were defined: under 12 months (G1), between 12 and 60 months (G2), and over 60 months (G3). After anesthesia induction and mechanical ventilation, maximal and minimal aortic and carotid peak flow were measured. ΔVpeak
resultsSixty-seven patients were enrolled. 22 (32.4%) patients in G1, 21 (31.3%) in G2 and 24 (35.8%) in G3. The determination coefficient (r) between ΔVpeak
conclusionsΔVpeak
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.