Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133826›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025

Conservative management of giant retroperitoneal hematoma after cesarean section in severe preeclampsia: a rare case report.

Jingwen Yu, Mengge Ke, Guangming Wang

Abstract readCase Reports
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jingwen YuGenetic Testing center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, DaLi, 671000, China.
Mengge KeThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, ZhengZhou, 450000, China.
Guangming WangGenetic Testing center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dali University, DaLi, 671000, China. wgm1991@dali.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpontaneous retroperitoneal hematoma (RPH) after cesarean section is an extremely rare disease with various causes, which can lead to unexplained maternal shock and death. Because cases of RPH are extremely rare in obstetric settings, there is also a paucity of literature. CASE PRESENTATION: This study reports a rare case of giant RPH after cesarean section. The patient underwent cesarean section due to severe preeclampsia at 38 weeks of gestation. The procedure was uneventful with little intraoperative bleeding, but a huge retroperitoneal hematoma developed 18 h after the operation and was successfully managed conservatively.

conclusionsThe treatment taste of retroperitoneal hematoma depends on the size of the hematoma, the etiology, and the hemodynamic status of the patient. For patients in stable condition, conservative treatment can be adopted, such as fluid infusion, blood transfusion, vascular embolization and hematoma drainage.

Indexed as

Cesarean SectionConservative TreatmentHematomaPostoperative ComplicationsPre-EclampsiaAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyRetroperitoneal SpaceCaesarean sectionCase reportHuge retroperitoneal hematomaInterventional therapy

Identifiers

PMID40133826
PMCPMC11934542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.