ArticleAnnals of intensive care2025
Amikacin use in critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy: the AMIDIAL-ICU study.
Article in Annals of intensive care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Considerations of Amikacin Pharmacotherapy in Adults-A Narrative Review with Focus on Safety and TDM.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Genotypic and phenotypic landscape of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolated from respiratory and non-respiratory samples in a tertiary hospital.BMC microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT) is common in intensive care units (ICUs), yet optimal amikacin dosing in this context remains poorly understood.
methodsWe conducted a prospective observational study across 18 French hospitals from April 2020 to January 2022. Adult ICU patients (aged > 18 years) receiving their first amikacin dose while on RRT were included. Data on demographics, RRT modalities, amikacin dosing, and therapeutic drug monitoring were collected. Using a pharmacokinetic modeling approach, we evaluated various amikacin regimens and simulated target attainment probabilities across different minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs).
resultsA total of 111 patients were included, with approximately two-thirds receiving continuous RRT. The median amikacin dose was 27 (25-30) mg/kg. Amikacin peak (Cmax) and trough concentrations were monitored in 53 (47.8%) and 76 (68.5%) patients, respectively. Continuous RRT and a history of chronic kidney disease reduced dialytic clearance. For a MIC ≤ 4 mg/L, a 15 mg/kg amikacin dose achieved Cmax/MIC and AUC/MIC targets in ≥ 90% of patients on intermittent dialysis, while 20 mg/kg was required for those on continuous dialysis. For a MIC = 8 mg/L, a 30 mg/kg dose was necessary to achieve Cmax/MIC ≥ 8.
conclusionsOur findings highlight suboptimal adherence to amikacin monitoring guidelines in ICU patients on RRT. Using pharmacokinetic modeling, we identified amikacin dosing recommendations ranging from 15 to 35 mg/kg to optimize efficacy and minimize risks, depending on MIC and dialysis modality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.