ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2025
Beyond the expected: a supratentorial ependymoma imitating a meningioma.
Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSupratentorial ependymomas are rare tumors, particularly in adults, and can present similarly to more common extra-axial masses like meningiomas on imaging. Differentiating between these lesions is crucial for appropriate management. CASE PRESENTATION: A 16-year-old girl presented with a 1.5-year history of headaches, occasional blurring of vision, and a recent seizure. MRI revealed a 4.7 × 4.0 × 6.9 cm dural-based, extra-axial lesion in the left parietal-temporal region, initially presumed to be a meningioma. The patient underwent a neuronavigation-guided craniotomy with excision of the lesion. Intraoperative findings described a soft, vascular, solid-cystic extra-axial mass, which was initially diagnosed as a meningioma based on preoperative imaging but later confirmed to be a supratentorial ependymoma, ZFTA fusion-positive, CNS WHO grade 3, through histopathological and molecular analysis. Postoperatively, the patient showed no neurological deficits, and a residual tumor was identified on follow-up imaging. DISCUSSION: This case illustrates the diagnostic challenge posed by the rare presentation of supratentorial, extra-axial ependymomas mimicking meningiomas. Although meningiomas are the most common extra-axial intracranial tumors, some radiological features such as cystic appearance and multiloculation on imaging should raise suspicion for ependymoma or other mimics. However, a definitive diagnosis can only be made through histopathological examination.
conclusionSupratentorial, extra-axial masses are often misdiagnosed as meningiomas. Such ependymomas can closely resemble meningiomas on imaging. This case underscores the importance of maintaining a broad differential diagnosis for extra-axial masses and highlights the role of certain radiological features that can help with accurate diagnosis or at least raise suspicion of meningioma mimics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40133725What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.