Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133647›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025

Simultaneous enantioselective determination of 2-, 3-, and 4-methylmethcathinones; their isomers; and major phase-1 metabolites in oral fluid of drug abusers using enantioselective high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Giorgi Kobidze, Alfredo Fabrizio Lo Faro, Aurora Balloni, Giorgia Sprega, Marta Massano, Sarah M R Wille, Giuseppe Basile, Tivadar Farkas, Anastasio Tini, Francesco Paolo Busardò and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Giorgi KobidzeDepartment of Excellence-Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
Alfredo Fabrizio Lo FaroDepartment of Excellence-Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
Aurora BalloniDepartment of Excellence-Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
Giorgia SpregaDepartment of Excellence-Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
Marta MassanoDepartment of Chemistry, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Sarah M R WilleLaboratory of Toxicology, National Institute of Criminalistics and Criminology (NICC), 1120, Brussels, Belgium.
Giuseppe BasileDepartment of Trauma Surgery, IRCCS Galeazzi Orthopedic Institute, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
Tivadar FarkasInstitute of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Tbilisi State University, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia.
Anastasio TiniDepartment of Excellence-Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60121, Ancona, Italy.
Francesco Paolo BusardòDepartment of Excellence-Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Università Politecnica Delle Marche, 60121, Ancona, Italy. f.p.busardo@staff.univpm.it.
Bezhan ChankvetadzeInstitute of Physical and Analytical Chemistry, School of Exact and Natural Sciences, Tbilisi State University, 0179, Tbilisi, Georgia. jpba_bezhan@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2379-9815

Funding

Shota Rustaveli National Science Foundation N◦ FR-22-971
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The most powerful and widely used detector for clinical and toxicological analyses is undoubtedly the mass spectrometer (MS) due to its specificity and high sensitivity. However, it cannot differentiate enantiomers from each other, as well as cannot easily distinguish between positional isomers. Therefore, the components of interest to the analysis at hand need to be separated prior to their detection by MS in order to reliably identify and quantify their enantiomers and positional isomers. In the present study, the simultaneous chemo- and enantioseparation of the drugs of abuse, 2-, 3-, and 4-methylmethcathinones, is described. The developed method was applied to 15 oral fluid (OF) samples collected by police in Belgium and found positive for mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone, 4-MMC) based on a nonselective method for enantiomers and positional isomers. However, re-analyzing these samples with the analytical method proposed in this report indicated that mephedrone was present in only 1 of them, while 6 samples contained 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC) and 12 samples contained 2-methylmethcathinone (2-MMC). At the same time, four OF samples contained both 2- and 3-MMC. The developed method enabled the enantioselective analysis of major metabolites of methylmethcathinones, such as their N-demethyl derivatives (nor-MMCs), as well as, at least partially, of their dihydrometabolites. In addition to their positional isomers, other structural isomers of MMCs, such as buphedrone, metamfepramone, and ethcathinone, could also be detected enantioselectively.

Indexed as

Illicit DrugsMethamphetamineSalivaSubstance Abuse DetectionTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, High Pressure LiquidHumansIsomerismLimit of DetectionStereoisomerism3-methylmethcathinoneIllicit DrugsmephedroneMethamphetamineDrugs of abuseEnantioseparationsMethylmethcathinones and metabolitesPolysaccharide-based chiral columnsSeparation of positional isomers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.