ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Simultaneous enantioselective determination of 2-, 3-, and 4-methylmethcathinones; their isomers; and major phase-1 metabolites in oral fluid of drug abusers using enantioselective high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interpol review of forensic drug chemistry, 2022-2025.Forensic science international. Synergy · 2026Review
- Emergence of 2-MMC in the French Alps: description of 13 clinical and forensic toxicology cases.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The most powerful and widely used detector for clinical and toxicological analyses is undoubtedly the mass spectrometer (MS) due to its specificity and high sensitivity. However, it cannot differentiate enantiomers from each other, as well as cannot easily distinguish between positional isomers. Therefore, the components of interest to the analysis at hand need to be separated prior to their detection by MS in order to reliably identify and quantify their enantiomers and positional isomers. In the present study, the simultaneous chemo- and enantioseparation of the drugs of abuse, 2-, 3-, and 4-methylmethcathinones, is described. The developed method was applied to 15 oral fluid (OF) samples collected by police in Belgium and found positive for mephedrone (4-methylmethcathinone, 4-MMC) based on a nonselective method for enantiomers and positional isomers. However, re-analyzing these samples with the analytical method proposed in this report indicated that mephedrone was present in only 1 of them, while 6 samples contained 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC) and 12 samples contained 2-methylmethcathinone (2-MMC). At the same time, four OF samples contained both 2- and 3-MMC. The developed method enabled the enantioselective analysis of major metabolites of methylmethcathinones, such as their N-demethyl derivatives (nor-MMCs), as well as, at least partially, of their dihydrometabolites. In addition to their positional isomers, other structural isomers of MMCs, such as buphedrone, metamfepramone, and ethcathinone, could also be detected enantioselectively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40133647What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.