ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2025
Application of MALDI TOF and DART mass spectrometry as novel tools for classification of anaerobic gut fungi strains.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Gut mycobiome in cardiometabolic disease progression: current evidence and future directions.Frontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anaerobic gut fungi (AGF) have emerged as promising candidates for optimized biogas and biofuel production due to their unique repertoire of potent lignocellulose-degrading enzymes. However, identifying AGF strains through standard fungal DNA barcodes still poses challenges due to their distinct genomic features. This study explored the applicability of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI) and direct analysis in real-time (DART) mass spectrometry (MS) as alternative methods for AGF identification. Further, the capability of the methods to differentiate strains from different growth phases was investigated. The study found that both MALDI and DART were viable methods for AGF strain identification. MALDI proved to be a precise and robust technique for strain discrimination with prediction accuracies of 94% for unknown standard samples. Even at longer growth times (>3 weeks) MALDI achieved good prediction accuracies with 84%; however, younger cultures (72 h) were only predicted with 63% accuracy. The fast on-target lysis with minimal chemical demand yielded suitable spectra for strain differentiation. DART MS, while effective with prediction accuracies of samples with the same age of up to 93%, exhibited lower prediction accuracies for cultures of different ages, with 14% for young (72 h) and 71% for old (>3 weeks) samples. Further research could enhance the capabilities of these mass spectrometry methods for AGF identification and broaden their application to species-level discrimination and a wider range of AGF genera.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.