ArticleScientific reports2025
Image reconstruction method based on backprojection filtration algorithm in C-arm computed tomography.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
C-arm CT is movable and plays an important role in clinical surgical treatment. This paper proposes a new image reconstruction method for C-arm computed tomography (CT) using the advantages of backprojection filtration (BPF) algorithm. It first collects the projection data in a short scan, then rearranges the collected projection data into parallel projection data, and finally achieves the 3D image reconstruction in C-arm CT based on the two-step Hilbert transform method. At the same projection data acquisition frequency, compared with the commonly used FDK algorithm in C-arm CT, the advantage of the proposed method is that it only requires the projection data within a short scan, reducing radiation dose by nearly half. In addition, unlike the original BPF algorithm, the scanning angle integration interval in the backprojection of the proposed method is fixed, which improves the reconstruction efficiency and parallelism. Its reconstruction efficiency is nearly twice that of the FDK algorithm. The results of simulation and real data experiments have demonstrated the effectiveness of this proposed method.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.