ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
Higher Pregnancy Success Rates in Patients with Diminished Ovarian Reserve < 40 Years When Initially Treated by Intrauterine Insemination with Mild Ovarian Stimulation Compared to In Vitro Fertilization Alone: A Pilot Study.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For women with idiopathic diminished ovarian reserve (DOR), direct start with IVF has been suggested to potentially shorten the time to pregnancy. Others however prefer intra-uterine insemination with ovarian stimulation (IUI + OS) due to the expected low response in IVF. In this pilot study, we determined the effect of these two strategies in women with DOR < 40 years. From a retrospective cohort, we included 135 women that met the diagnostic criteria of DOR. Patients were randomly referred to two different outpatient clinics in the Netherlands between 2012-2018 because of subfertility. Primary outcome was clinical pregnancy; secondary outcomes included ongoing pregnancies, live births, time to pregnancy and pregnancy-related complications. An instrumental variable analysis was used to assess the average effect of treatment with IUI + OS followed by IVF (protocol A) compared to IVF alone (protocol B) and correct for (unknown) confounders. Treatment protocol A was performed in 72.6% patients in Centre 1 and 30.6% in Centre 2. In Centre 1 61.6% (45/73) women had a clinical pregnancy compared to 41.9% (26/62) in Centre 2 (difference 19.7% (95% CI 3.1%-36.3%), p = 0.02). Early miscarriage occurred in 24% of the women in Centre 1 in comparison to 45% of the women in Centre 2. There were no significant differences in pregnancy-related complications. This pilot study suggests that women < 40 with DOR, if treated with IUI + OS followed by IVF, have higher estimated cumulative clinical pregnancy success, with a trend towards higher ongoing pregnancies and live births, in comparison to women treated with IVF alone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.