ArticleScientific reports2025
Opportunistic bacterial pathogens in bioaerosols emitted at municipal wastewater treatment plants, South Africa.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Burden of Early-Childhood Atopic Disease: Prevalence and Risk Factors for Allergic Rhinitis in an Informal Settlement in South Africa.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biofiltration of Bioaerosols Emitted from Organic Waste Management Facilities: A Review.Microorganisms · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Aeration tanks at wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) emit significant amounts of bioaerosols containing potentially hazardous infectious material. Occupational exposure to airborne pathogens can pose health risks to WWTP workers. Bioaerosol samples collected at aeration tanks of two typical municipal WWTPs that use different aeration modes were analysed to investigate the composition and diversity of airborne bacteria in wastewater environments, using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Thirty-six potential airborne bacterial pathogens were identified in the air samples, and these were dominated by Bacillus, Enterococcus, Clostridium, Streptococcus, Acinetobacter, Enterobacter, Pseudomonas, Bacteroides fragilis, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Escherichia/Shigella. Bioaerosols from mechanical aeration tanks (72%, 26/36) had a relatively higher richness and diversity of airborne bacterial pathogens than diffused aeration tanks (17%, 6/36). Furthermore, most of the identified airborne bacterial pathogens (78%, 28/36) were classified as Risk Group 2 according to the revised South African Regulation for Hazardous Biological Agents, 2022, and up to 70% of these were gram-negative bacteria. The presence of potentially pathogenic bacteria in the ambient air at WWTPs suggests an elevated risk of bioaerosol exposure for workers. Therefore, further research and site-specific risk assessments are recommended to guide the implementation of effective bioaerosol strategies to protect workers' health, with special attention paid to WWTPs that use mechanical aerators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.