ArticleNature medicine2025
AI-guided precision parenteral nutrition for neonatal intensive care units.
Article in Nature medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT07712198 (Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Sarcopenia Risk in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Intracranial Pathology), which is not on this map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Artificial Intelligence-Based Prediction of Sarcopenia Risk in Intensive Care Unit Patients With Intracranial Pathology
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analysis of factors driving variations in neonatal parenteral nutrition over a decade: A retrospective study.Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · 2026Article
- Chemical-Sensing Catheters for Long-Term and Personalized Therapeutic Management.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Nutrition: Current Uses, Challenges, and Opportunities.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Article
- A lesson from the past and the future of artificial intelligence in medical decision-making.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026Review
- Clinical evaluation of a novel preterm standardised parenteral nutrition system for targeted macronutrient delivery.Pediatric research · 2026Article
- A generalist precision medication framework using temporal causal inference based on treatment-free physiological profiles.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Foundation models in healthcare: a comprehensive review from technical advances to clinical translation.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- AI Guided Parenteral Nutrition Therapy After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Parenteral Nutrition: Enhancing Patient Outcomes Through Global Experience and the Bulgarian Context.Nutrients · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-guided nutritional therapy in the ICU.Current opinion in clinical nutrition and metabolic care · 2026Review
- Review
- Application of Supply Processing and Distribution Model in Interventional Consumables Management Based on Whole-Process Coding Technology.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
- Virtual medicine: medical AI in human health and diseases.Military Medical Research · 2026Review
- Review
- The Perceived Roles of AI in Clinical Practice: National Survey of 941 Academic Physicians.JMIR AI · 2025Article
- Large language models and clinical calculations: to err is human and machines are not exempt.Pediatric research · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence-, organoid-, and organ-on-chip-powered models to improve pre-clinical animal testing of vaccines and immunotherapeutics: potential, progress, and challenges.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
46 authors.
Funding
Abstract
One in ten neonates are admitted to neonatal intensive care units, highlighting the need for precise interventions. However, the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in guiding neonatal care remains underexplored. Total parenteral nutrition (TPN) is a life-saving treatment for preterm neonates; however, implementation of the therapy in its current form is subjective, error-prone and resource-consuming. Here, we developed TPN2.0-a data-driven approach that optimizes and standardizes TPN using information collected routinely in electronic health records. We assembled a decade of TPN compositions (79,790 orders; 5,913 patients) at Stanford to train TPN2.0. In addition to internal validation, we also validated our model in an external cohort (63,273 orders; 3,417 patients) from a second hospital. Our algorithm identified 15 TPN formulas that can enable a precision-medicine approach (Pearson's R = 0.94 compared to experts), increasing safety and potentially reducing cost. A blinded study (n = 192) revealed that physicians rated TPN2.0 higher than current best practice. In patients with high disagreement between the actual prescriptions and TPN2.0, standard prescriptions were associated with increased morbidities (for example, odds ratio = 3.33; P value = 0.0007 for necrotizing enterocolitis), while TPN2.0 recommendations were linked to reduced risk. Finally, we demonstrated that TPN2.0 employing a transformer architecture enabled guideline-adhering, physician-in-the-loop recommendations that allow collaboration between the care team and AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.