ArticleScientific reports2025
Relative expression orderings based prediction of treatment response to Anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in advanced melanoma.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of Bioinformatics in Identifying Novel Biomarkers for Immune Cell Exhaustion and Tumor Microenvironment.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) plays a critical role in immune tolerance and evasion within the tumor microenvironment, and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy has shown efficacy in treating advanced melanoma. However, response rates vary significantly among patients, necessitating the identification of reliable biomarkers to predict treatment efficacy. Based on within-sample relative expression orderings, we analyzed RNA sequencing data from melanoma patients to construct a predictive model comprising gene pairs associated with treatment response. The model's performance was validated across multiple independent datasets and assessed for correlations with immune infiltration and survival outcomes. The constructed 15-pair model achieved a prediction accuracy of 100% in training datasets and 89.47% in validation sets. Validation in melanoma patients lacking treatment response data revealed significant differences between predicted responders and non-responders across datasets, with the model being an independent prognostic factor. Increased immune cell infiltration was observed in responders, correlating with higher expression levels of key immune checkpoint genes. The relative expression orderings-based model shows promise as a tool for predicting responses to anti-PD-1 therapy in melanoma patients, supporting personalized treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.