ArticleScientific reports2025
AI-powered model for predicting mortality risk in VA-ECMO patients: a multicenter cohort study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Review of the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Scoping Review Study.Health science reports · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence-guided tools in adult ECMO: Current advancements, emerging Trends and future directions.Perfusion · 2026Review
- A Contemporary Guide of Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Cardiogenic Shock.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Challenges of ECMO use for severe trauma: a narrative review.Hereditas · 2025Review
- Beyond Standard Parameters: Precision Hemodynamic Monitoring in Patients on Veno-Arterial ECMO.Journal of personalized medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a critical life support technology for severely ill patients. Despite its benefits, patients face high costs and significant mortality risks. To improve clinical decision-making, this study aims to develop a non-invasive, efficient artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled model to predict the risk of mortality within 28 days post-weaning from VA-ECMO. A multicenter, retrospective cohort study was conducted across five hospitals in China, including all the patients who received VA-ECMO support between January 2020 and January 2024. Based on the innovatively selected 25 easily obtainable patient examination features as potentially relevant, this study involved developing ten predictive models using both classical and advanced machine learning techniques. The model's performance is evaluated using various statistical metrics and the optimal predictive model are identified. Feature correlations are analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients, and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) are employed to interpret feature importance. Decision curve analysis is used to evaluate the clinical utility of the predictive models. The study included 225 patients, with 66 patients from one hospital forming the training cohort. Three validation cohorts were used: internal validation with 16 patients from the training hospital and external validation with 30 and 60 patients from the other 4 hospitals. The random forest model emerged as the best predictor of 28-day mortality, achieving an AUROC of 1.00 in the training cohort and 1.00, 0.97, and 0.93 in the three validation cohorts, respectively. Despite the limited training data, the developed model, eCMoML, demonstrated high accuracy, generalizability and reliability. The model will be available online for immediate use by clinicians. The eCMoML model, validated in a multicenter cohort study, offers a rapid, stable, and accurate tool for predicting 28-day mortality post-VA-ECMO weaning. It has the potential to significantly enhance clinical decision-making, helping doctors better assess patient prognosis, optimize treatment plans, and improve survival rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.