Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40133442›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An enhanced image restoration using deep learning and transformer based contextual optimization algorithm.

A Senthil Anandhi, M Jaiganesh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A Senthil AnandhiResearch Scholar-ICE, Anna University, Chennai, India. senthilanandhi.aa@gmail.com.
M JaiganeshDepartment of IT, Karpagam College of Engineering, Coimbatore, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Image processing and restoration are important in computer vision, particularly for images that are damaged by noise, blur, and other issues. Traditional methods often have a hard time with problems like periodic noise and do not effectively combine local and global data during the restoration process. To address these problems, we suggest an enhanced image restoration model that merges Lewin architecture with SwinIR, using advanced deep learning methods. This approach combines these techniques for a better restoration process improved by 4.2%. The model's effectiveness is checked using PSNR and SSIM measurements, showing that it can lower noise while keeping key image details intact. When compared to traditional methods, our model shows better results, creating a new standard in image restoration for difficult situations. Test results show that this combined approach greatly enhances fixing performance across various image datasets, making it a strong solution for clearer images and noise reduction.

Indexed as

Deep learningImage processingImage restorationLewin architecturePeriodic noisePSNRSSIMSwinIR

Identifiers

PMID40133442
PMCPMC11937541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.